Development of a Simple Technique to Automate Reverse Phase HPLC Fraction Pooling, Evaporation, and Reformatting


Nov 22 2017 Read 534 Times

Free to read

This article has been unlocked and is ready to read.


Recently, the SampleGenie™ was developed by Genevac as a simple item of laboratory ‘automation’ to help scientists who work with, or store their dried samples in, small vials, but where their sample is initially dissolved in a large volume of solvent. SampleGenie (Figure 1) is essentially a glass flask to which a smaller vial can be attached, an inert seal ensures the integrity of the joint [1].

SampleGenie has been successfully implemented within both medicinal chemistry laboratories and dedicated purification groups where samples are typically purified by reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Samples elute from the chromatography column in volumes larger than the average storage vial. Normal practice would be to dry the sample or fractions before pooling, and then re-dissolve in a minimal volume of solvent, such as dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), transfer to the small vial, and dry to remove the DMSO. SampleGenie allows for the direct evaporation of large volumes (up to 250 ml) directly into a vial of choice.

SampleGenie has been developed for use with Genevac HT and EZ-2 evaporators as well as the Rocket™ Evaporation System (Figure 2) [2].  

Early in the development issues were found with reverse phase HPLC fractions where a proportion of the samples stuck to the glass of the flask rather than fully entering the vial. This paper discusses the causes of this problem and the development of a solution that delivers more acceptable sample recovery.

Data from areas of applications outside of reverse phase HPLC has shown very high levels of sample recovery in the vial; two such being environmental analysis [1,4] and metabolic studies [3], where recoveries in excess of 90% or 95% were reported. For most scientists these are acceptable as any method of drying and transfer to a vial will have some losses. Losses can be minimised by washing out the flask, as could be done in this case, however this may reduce the gain in efficiency obtained by using SampleGenie. 

Importantly, with reverse phase HPLC fractions the sample is usually dissolved in a mixture of water and organic solvent (acetonitrile or methanol), whereas, samples in the other applications are normally in a single organic solvent (or mixture of similar solvents). Also, in environmental or metabolism analysis the concentration of sample is typically low, a few milligrams (mg) of sample per 100 millilitres (ml), whereas a purified sample may be as concentrated as 10mg/ml, or more.

With high concentratrations samples come out of solution before the volume is small enough to occupy only the vial. Evaporative drying is typically concentration until dryness, and at the point where the solution becomes saturated the dissolved sample will crash out, and stick to the flask (Figure 3). 

Compounding this, in vacuum evaporation, the organic solvent evaporates more quickly than the water in a fraction. Once all the organic solvent has evaporated, non-polar molecules which are insoluble in water, will also crash out. 


A range of solutions were considered and evaluated, these can be subdivided into two categories, either, make the flask ‘non-stick’, or prevent the sample crashing out in the first place.

One ‘non-stick’ solution considered was to end terminate the free silanol groups on the glass molecules, typically with a silane. Several commercially available treatments where tried, however, none of these coatings were that successful, the samples still crashed out, and still adhered to the side of the flask. The use of the silane treatment did help move all the sample closer to the neck of the flask but none was considered adequate. In addition, none were permanent, in that they were removed over time by washing of the flask. The flasks were also coated with a Teflon® type material, however, those providing this material had difficulty in ensuring the adhesion between the coating and the glass, and delamination was a risk. This solution was dismissed.

The solution showing the most promise was that of preventing the sample crashing out in the first place by the addition of a solvent which would keep the sample in solution. Any such solvent would have to have a similar boiling point to water so that it did not all evaporate with the acetonitrile. Two were considered, toluene and 1,4-dioxane. Initial tests with toluene failed because it is immiscible with water, whereas 1,4-dioxane was much more successful. 

Co-solvent Addition Experiments

A series of experiments were carried out using the Genevac Rocket evaporation system with SampleGenie. In this study three standard compounds were used, each was selected for a different solvent range based on solubility and where they are most likely to elute in gradient reverse phase HPLC:

Acetonitrile range

Test substance








These trials were done in two fraction volumes, 100 ml and 200 ml, with 100 mg and 200 mg of the standard compounds used, respectively. The HPLC fraction method at 40°C was selected for all experiments. The recovery levels were between 97-100% collected in the vial (Table 1).

The amount of 1,4-dioxane needed depends on the volume of the vial and the amount of water in the sample. To determine how much 1,4-dioxane is required to add, first select the sample with the least amount of acetonitrile and, depending on the volume, select the corresponding amount of 1,4-dioxane from the look up table, Figure 5. Although 1,4-dioxane (BP 101°C) has a similar boiling point to water, because of the low latent heat it will evaporate quicker. So, hydrophobic compounds will need more care to avoid sticking to the flasks. 

Fraction % Organic


Fraction Volume
































Figure 5. Look up table of 1,4-dioxane addition for fraction handling


SampleGenie is a straightforward way to concentrate or dry large volume samples directly into smaller vials using the revolutionary Rocket evaporation system. To overcome the potential problem of dissolved samples crashing out of solution, sticking to the glass flask, and therefore not getting into the vial, the addition of a moderate quantity of 1,4-dioxane is a simple and effective method. This work has been summarised in a look up table to assist users determine how much 1,4-dioxane is required to add for different fractions.


1. Evaluation of a new technology which enables large volumes to be concentrated directly into a small vial for use in environmental analysis. Dr. Raffaele Faita & Dr. Agostino Brunetta, Leochimica Laboratories, Italy. 

First published in International Environmental Technology 2008 Vol. 18 No. 6 pp44 & 45, 

2. Development of a Novel Parallel Evaporator - Developing high power condensation heating to enable very fast parallel evaporation, in a safe, and controlled manner. Roger Lee-Smith & David Griffin Genevac Ltd, Ipswich, UK.

First published in LabMate October 2008.

3. Assessment of Sample Recovery using SampleGenie to Automate Fraction Pooling into a Storage Vial, Peter Bennett, Servier Research, Slough, UK. 

4. Evaluation of a Novel, Large Volume Evaporative Sample Preparation Technique. Felix Massat, Benoît Planel, & Antoine Venezia, Laboratoire départemental d’analyses de la Drôme, Valence, France.


Teflon is a registered trade mark of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company 


Digital Edition

Labmate UK & Ireland July

July 2018

In This Edition Articles - Why Does Nanotechnology Require Mass Spectrometry Spotlight Features Luminescence, UV & Microplate Readers - New Confocal Laser Scanning Microscope Combine...

View all digital editions


AACC Annual Meeting & Clinical Lab Expo 2018

Jul 29 2018 Chicago, IL, USA

HPLC 2018

Jul 29 2018 Washington DC, USA

M&M 2018

Aug 05 2018 Baltimore, MD, USA

DXC 2018

Aug 06 2018 Westminster, CO, USA

Food Science 2018

Aug 06 2018 Berlin, Germany

View all events