Research news
Largest global research undertaken since COVID-19 pandemic showed scientists remain trusted
An international study on public trust in science ─ conducted across 68 countries ─ has found that most people trust scientists and believe they should be more involved in society and policymaking.
The study gathered 71,922 respondents ─ with 2,008 of them from the UK ─ providing the largest global dataset on trust in scientists since the COVID-19 pandemic.
“The UK has a generally high level of trust in science, ranking above many European countries, including Denmark, Germany, Sweden, and Belgium. “
Trust in scientists is higher among women, older individuals, and those with more education. Interestingly, a conservative political orientation is linked to lower trust in science in North America and [some] parts of Europe. However, this pattern does not hold globally, suggesting that the political leadership may influence such attitudes in different regions,” said Dr Eleonora Alabrese, an economist from the University of Bath, who collected responses for the UK sample.
Key findings
Global rankings of how populations placed their trust in science/scientists:
Published in Nature Human Behaviours, this research was conducted by TISP, a Harvard University-based consortium led by Dr Viktoria Cologna, of Harvard and the federal Swiss university ETH Zurich (Institute of Technology) and Dr Niels G Mede of the University of Zurich which included 241 researchers from 169 institutions worldwide.
“Our results show that most people, in most countries, have relatively high trust in scientists and want them to play an active role in society and policymaking,” said Dr Viktoria Cologna who was lead researcher on the project.
Challenges
However, the findings highlighted some areas of concern. Globally, fewer than half of respondents ─ 42% ─ believed that scientists pay attention to others’ views. The findings also show that many people, in many countries, feel that the priorities of science do not always align well with their own priorities.
Participants assigned high priority to research dedicated to improving public health, solving energy problems and reducing poverty. Research on developing defence and military technology was assigned a lower priority. In fact, participants explicitly believe that science prioritises developing defence and military technology more than they desire.
Recommendations
The consortium of academics recommends that scientists take these results seriously and find ways to be more receptive to feedback and open to dialogue with the public. Also consider ways, especially in Western countries to reach out to conservative groups, and consider their role as scientists with the wider community, about how to set priorities that align with public values.
“While trust in science remains generally high, even a small decline in trust from a minority could influence how scientific evidence is used in policymaking.
“These findings are crucial for scientists and policymakers working to maintain public trust in science,” said Dr Eleonora Alabrese.
For further reading please visit: 10.1038/s41562-024-02090-5
ILM Guide 2026/27