Does Bacon Cause Cancer?

Mass spectrometry & spectroscopy

Does Bacon Cause Cancer?

22 Jan, 2019

Published over 7 years ago. See the latest and most current information on Mass spectrometry & spectroscopy.

Sizzling bacon may be one of the most enticing aromas on the planet but according to new research from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), the tasty breakfast treat could be linked to cancer. Furthermore, the agency lists ham, salami and frankfurts alongside salt-cured pork. While the study has attracted plenty of controversy, agency director Christopher Wild maintains that the research is valid and should be taken seriously.

As an intergovernmental agency associated with the World Health Organisation of the United Nations, the IARC conducts and coordinates research into all types of cancers. Findings are usually well-received, though the agency sparked global outcry when it published reports suggesting that bacon, along with other red meats and glyphosate weedkiller, can cause cancer.

IARC claims bacon science is "crystal clear"

While the UN subsidiary stands by its research, Wild admits that communication lines could have been improved regarding how the information was published, and that public announcements were mishandled. "The audience has changed. If you went back 10 to 15 years the audience for the monographs was a professional audience – regulatory agencies, scientists, policymakers of different kinds. Now there’s such an interest in cancer and its causes that there’s a general public audience,” he explains.

That said, he maintains that ultimately, a link between eating bacon and developing cancer does exist. “The science was crystal clear,” he said. “We placed quite a bit of emphasis on the dose-response, if you like – the relationship between quantities eaten and effect.”

Understanding Grade 1 carcinogens

Wild also stresses that there is widespread misunderstanding of the IARC’s classification system, which categorises tobacco, ultraviolet radiation and alcohol as Grade 1 carcinogens, alongside processed meat. While scientific evidence suggests that all substances are strong enough to potentially cause cancer, they're not necessarily equally hazardous.

For example, the agency claims that consuming 50g of processed meat a day increases the risk of developing colorectal cancer by 18%, which is low for those with a low initial risk. It also states that eating 700 grams of red meat a week can increase the risk of developing bowel cancer. In comparison, smoking significantly increases the risk of developing lung cancer.

Want to know more about the latest health and medical developments? Spotlighting the recent regulations on heavy metal testing, 'Choosing the Optimum Plasma Spectrochemistry Technique for Measuring Elemental Impurities in Pharmaceuticals' is adapted from a chapter in Robert Thomas’s new book, Measuring Elemental Impurities in Pharmaceuticals: A Practical Guide.

Latest News

Lab Asia 33.4 - August 2026

Explore our Digital Edition

Discover the latest news and research

Digital edition

Explore Our Other Sites

Envirotech Online
New oxygen sensor range targets OEM gas detection applications
Explore more Arrow
Pollution Solutions Online
Skid-mounted systems target oxygen and moisture removal for renewable natural gas
Explore more Arrow
Petro Online
Automated freezing-point testing arrives for jet fuel: what ASTM D8615 changes for lab workflows
Explore more Arrow
Chromatography Today
UHPLC–MS/MS methodology detects multiple algal toxins in fish plasma
Explore more Arrow